Part 3 -The Doorway to Belief: How FAITH Opens the Proof of God!

Those who HATE or at the very Least dislike Jesus and his Church, do so FIRST of all because We as believers do not live up to our words or his Word, but that aside they would HATE him for the simple reason of "The Obedience Question" attached to the "Good News" of the Bible. 

Under all the "fake anger" and questions of our motives that we, as believers are not allowed to answer because our evidence is not good enough, there is that simple problem at the core of every argument they make, they do not like obedience to God, that is the real issue, no matter what is said against the Bible or God!

Let's not kid ourselves here, say what you will, that is the single most hated thing to mankind,..... "FIX the world's troubles, take away our problems of Hunger, Sickness and Poverty but do not with all that, require US to OBEY God in return. Its my life, leave me alone and let me do as I please!" 

ALL THE ARGUMENTS IN THE WORLD CANNOT HIDE THAT FACT!

STATEMENTS LIKE THIS ONE ARE AN EXAMPLE OF THE LEVEL OF HATE.

"Always remember, faith is the tool of deceivers and the abode (house) of folly and error. Its sole purpose is to keep good people from seeking the truth and understanding wisdom. Would the creator of all knowledge and wisdom insist that you remain ignorant by simply believing what you have been told by obviously duplicitous religious founders and leaders?"

WHILE I AGREE THAT RELIGION IS FILLED WITH THESE KINDS OF PEOPLE AS IS ATHEISM, THIS STATEMENT IS IN ITSELF DUPLICITOUS IN NATURE AND REQUIRES US TO BELIEVE THAT GOD DOESN'T AND DOES EXIST IN THE SAME STATEMENT! How would one know how the God of Wisdom and Knowledge would act if he doesn't exist? 

The Bible is God's wisdom and KNOWLEDGE BUT it's is said to be mythological and spurious at the core so the question is a straw argument MEANT TO STIR EMOTION NOT ANSWER A QUESTION or PROVE ANYTHING ONE WAY OR THE OTHER!

God's kind of Faith as defined in Hebrews 11:1 CANNOT in any way be used to perform these acts only the normal everyday faith of man is a tool to do evil, that should be obvious to anyone who studies the word of God seriously but some do not study to learn, they look to find fault and this is intellectual dishonesty bold and obvious. 

It is humanism that has failed to prove its purpose, BECAUSE whenever it has held sway in any nation around the world DESPOTISM and heartbreak rule the day JUST AS with false Religion, SO WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE, THEY BOTH DERIVE POWER FROM SELFISHNESS NOT TRUE FAITH?

I do not disrespect you or what you believe, but you think its o.k. to disrespect me and my God, WHY? Because your thinking about God makes my belief a Myth to be trodden upon and disrespected, but your beliefs are to be respected and followed simply because mine are mythical to you? That at its face is garbage, because my evidence HAS NEVER been disproved, simply DISMISSED out of hand which only proves that in a battle of ideas you LOOSE!

I do not ask that you believe me, I only ask for a fair hearing in regard to God and creation's proof FOUND ONLY BY FAITH ALONE! Are you so afraid I'm right that you resort to insult's and false statements about faith, that says volumes about the insecurity of your belief's and that goes for Christians as well, civility should rule the day not fighting each other over nothing solid.

Let's continue with my analysis:

"They require belief in logical contradictions. Virgin births, we now know, are possible, but the technology for the implantation of fertilized eggs did not exist two thousand years ago." 

This is a weird remark, given the fact the bible says Mary WAS a virgin literally but this fact did not stop God from CREATING a child in her womb, something very LOGICAL for an all powerful God don't you think? The Miracle was not that she was a virgin but that she gave birth to God's own Word made flesh!

This is just an attempt to set up a false premise and destroy the premise by the "time setting" being off from modern times, as if ONLY man could perform this act. The problem is that Man must use God's creation (The Sperm) to implant life, God DID NOT, HE USED HIS WORD (The Seed) IMPLANTED and made FLESH, Mary was simply the vessel of Obedience!

"The belief in the Virgin birth entails the belief that God miraculously impregnated Mary with Himself. Such a belief defies experience but not logic. The Virgin birth is conceivable (to make a bad pun), unlike the Trinity. "

It only defies HIS experience not the experiences of New Testament people so the issue created here, doesn't hold water if one examines the evidence from scripture on the birth of Christ.
Likewise the Trinity Doctrine is said to be of Pagan Origin SIMPLY to make it easier to dismiss out of hand RATHER than subject oneself to proper biblical analysis WHICH WOULD MEAN ACTUALLY STUDYING THE BIBLE AS TRUTH instead of using it to beat up the concept of God! 

You will notice that he BEGINS this by calling ANYTHING we believe a 'Logical Contradiction' or We say that a statement, or set of statements is logically consistent when it involves no logical contradiction.  A logical contradiction is the conjunction of a statement S and it's denial not-S.   In logic, it is a fundamental law- the law of non contradiction- that a statement and its denial can not both be true at the same time. 

WITH THIS DEFINED AS OUR LOT, WE ARE AT THE BACK OF THE BUS BEFORE WE SPEAK, BUT IS IT SO, BECAUSE HE SAYS SO? 

I say the Christian Faith is the MOST Logical concept of all and Atheism the most Non-Logical concept of all. BUT that is a matter of my experience perspective because I have received the PROOF needed to know God personally they HAVE NOT! 

The Trinity is JUST as conceivable as any other biblical doctrine but because they cannot understand it, it becomes INCONCEIVABLE regardless of the evidence presented, to the Atheist, if we cannot FULLY explain it and prove it to them, it's not so! The problem with this line of reasoning is it is a two edged sword and they must explain FULLY why Evolution cannot be proved as well, even if they say they don't have too.

READ THE FOLLOWING:

"The Trinity of the Godhead IS NOT PAGAN , TAKE IT FROM AN EX-PAGAN! Wrapping your mind around who God really is!"

CLICK HERE NOW! 

 

"All arguments regarding these articles of faith are quite distinct from Rachel's argument. "

"To defend these articles of faith, the best one can hope for is to show that they cannot be shown to be false. However, the consequence of arguing that logical contradictions may nevertheless be true, seems undesirable."

THE BEST WE CAN HOPE FOR....really? Creation BEST fits all scientific methods while evolution has failed miserably for decades to meet the full investigative skills of the Scientist but predisposed people refuse to see the facts and keep up the deceptive double standard! 

The Real Evidence concerning Evolution compared to Young Earth Creationism!

The Intelligent design of God: What's the beef with a purposeful Creation?

Again he says: "the consequence of arguing that logical contradictions may nevertheless be true, seems undesirable. " ASSUMING that they are Logical Contradictions, this is a total Straw-Man diversion, the Christian Faith is NOT a Logical Contradiction at all, it's doctrines are HIDDEN from the understanding of a darkened mind ON PURPOSE.

You must seek truth by FAITH ALONE, all you will get otherwise is surface revelation which will explain little about God, thus your left with religious fill in the blank dogmas that make little sense!

"Such a defense requires the abandonment of the very logical principles required to make any argument and is therefore self-annihilating. "

According to his misguided preconceived notion about Christian belief, but once one is opened to understanding it from the perspective of the Faith of God they are the MOST Logical of Principles, after all we are dealing with the Spiritual Realm not the Physical Realm. 

This alone places the debate under a different "observation Technique" altogether for the Scientist. If the person testing FAITH is unsaved then his conclusions will not be correct unless observed from the standpoint of the spiritual PERSON OF FAITH, that is only Logical. You wouldn't want a blind person telling you about a sunset if they have never seen one, as you should want someone who understands God to explain him not a hypocrite WHO HATE THE CONCEPT OF GOD!

What if I wanted to test Atheism as to its validity, would I get any results testing its principles UNDER CHRISTIAN CONDITIONS? 

Of Course not, I would have to test it under unbelieving conditions or my results are tainted, and neither can Atheists study Christianity under the assumption of Atheistic thinking, that pollutes the results. 

It defies Logic to think that Atheists make the rules up concerning God and his creation before proper investigation is ever done, and then claim a non-bias with a smile! If an Atheist TRULY wants to find the PROOF of God they must do it as a believer for their results to be revealed. Faith from God cannot be revealed to a dark heart that refuses to see truth as it is, "The God Kind Of Faith" opens into light what is now hidden by darkness!

The insurmountable Evidence of a creative act is everywhere while the made-up version of beginnings has the stage in Schools. This is the sole reason they fear COMPARATIVE TEACHING OF BOTH THEORY'S in school, because once the Truth is out the children will see the hypocrisy and cover-up.

You CANNOT possibly believe that OUR limited human minds could ever get the entire scope of God without HIS EYES of understanding opening our hearts and minds, that's what the New Birth was for, to bring us from Darkness to Light. 

"The fact that arguments such as Rachel's and those defending articles of religious faith are not empirical or resolvable by scientific methods hardly makes them equally matters of faith."

 What is Empirical research? 

"It is a way of gaining knowledge by means of direct observation or experience. It is used to answer empirical questions, which must be precisely defined and answerable with data-theory regarding the topic under investigation. Based on this theory some statements, or hypotheses, will be proposed. 

From these hypotheses predictions about specific events are derived. 

These predictions can then be tested with a suitable experiment. Depending on the outcomes of the experiment, the theory on which the hypotheses and predictions were based will be supported or no."

There is no reason to believe that the Doctrines of the Bible cannot be looked at by Science ONCE Faith has been released in the Human Heart a Scientist can then look properly at the Subject at hand no longer blinded by self imposed restrictions. 

God created our ability to reason so it is only Logical that he requires us to use it. Reason however must be tempered with Faith Proof and Common Sense to arrive at the proper conclusion...UNBIASED.

 

Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledge AS REQUIRED, but Evolutionists have never corrected their glaring errors in text books...WHY?.

Atheism's Fall:The Demise of the Deniers of the Faith!

 

To be termed scientific, a method of inquiry must be based on gathering observable, empirical and measurable evidence subject to specific principles of reasoning. This is not done with the concept of God at all, they do not examine

A scientific method consists of the collection of data through observation experimentation, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses, this was and is done by Creationists but their Data is ignored by unprofessional scientists of Evolution simply because it doesn't support their personal beliefs. 

The Laws of logic are conceptual by nature and absolute. Being absolute they transcend space and time. They are not the properties of the physical universe (since they are conceptual) or of people (since people contradict each other, which would mean they weren't absolute). So, how do you account for them?

 

 We both are acting on Faith but the Church of Jesus has God's Proof contained in what they act on, Atheist's are acting on mere assumptions about God, but nonetheless trusting in a future answer in science, or somewhere that will fill in the gaps and Missing Links for them. IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN!

The “Missing Links” Of Evolution by
Richard Massey

How is that different from SIMPLE faith? It isn't, it's word play, redefining the obvious so it appears to be something else. A tactic used to dismiss and reshape the issue to appear one sided. But the facts involved once looked at from a PURELY SCIENTIFIC STANDPOINT cannot be denied for long!


The Logic of God 

In Search of God: The Language and Logic of Belief (Philosophy) 

The Philosophy Of The Spirit - A Study Of The Spiritual Nature Of Man And The Presence Of God, With A Supplementary Essay On The Logic Of Hegel (The Sacred Books) 

Logic and the Nature of God (Library of Philosophy and Religion) 

Man's vision of God and the logic of theism 

God Is Not Equal to Zero 

Strugglebook: A Logical Search for the Truth of GOD 

The Nature of Consciousness : The Structure of Reality: Theory of Everything Equation Revealed : Scientific Verification and Proof of Logic God Is 


"Mathematical Logic and the Philosophy of God and Man" 


A land born in a day;: Or, Irrefutable proof that the Holy Bible is the inspired word of God and offers the only way to eternal life


Proof That The Bible Is The Word Of God


God According to God: A Physicist Proves We've Been Wrong About God All Along


How Do We Know the Bible Is True (Contender's Bible Study Series)


 How Do We Know The Bible Is True?

Evidence the Bible is True 

Cracking The Prophetic Code 

Religion of Peace?: Why Christianity Is and Islam Isn't 

Is the Bible True . . . Really? 

10 Conclusive Proofs That God Exists And The Bible Is True 

Is the Bible True?: How Modern Debates and Discoveries Affirm the Essence of the Scriptures