Monday, January 24, 2011

The Bible: Circular Reasoning or Proof of God?

The problem with skeptics is NOT their natural skepticism which is good to have but the inconsistent and dishonest way in which they approach God and his word.

The statement "Christians can't use 'circular reasoning' by trying to prove the bible by quoting from the bible!"

This question which sounds reasonable to the masses who hate all things God, is lacking BOTH common sense and reasonableness if you use proper logic! The Bible is a written record of what happened from the beginning until the future, it is God's memory recorded in writing of the history of the earth. So to even think that its not O.K. to use it to prove the proposition that God exists is at best avoidance of PROOF.

It is like saying you cannot prove that the president lives in the White House by looking inside the White House to provide the necessary proof!

Or you cannot fix your Car by looking at what's wrong under the hood BY LOOKING AT THE BOOK of how to fix your car to find evidence of the problem!

Is it wrong to read the 'Origin of Species' to gain insight into Darwin's mind or is that also circular Reasoning?

The fallacy of petitio principii, or "begging the question", is committed "when a proposition which requires proof is assumed without proof."More specifically, petitio principii refers to arguing for a conclusion that has already been assumed in the premise, in effect "begging" any listener to "question" the basis of the logic.

Using the Bible to prove it true is a totally different thing because the Bible contains all the evidence needed to prove the proposition true, all that is needed is the FAITH of God to activate the mind to reason it out of the Bible.

Evolution on the other hand has many problems and issues that make this a problem, assumption is the Name of the Game with Evolution. Please IF you are a serious skeptic then please read the following Articles that PROVE evolution isn't true!

Evolution is Missing a Mathematical Formula!

http://darwinconspiracy.com/article_1_rev2.php

Darwinian Evolution is Missing a Way to Add Genes!

http://darwinconspiracy.com/article_2_rev2.php

Helpless Babies Contradict 'Survival of the Fittest'

http://darwinconspiracy.com/article_3_rev2.php

The fulfilled prophecies, the Amazing Consistency, and the many Scientific Statements of the Bible PROVE it to be the Word of God and thereby a book to gain witness of the facts about God and Creation.

Evolution lives on NEW discoveries (Constantly moving the Ages of everything around like chess pieces on a chaotic board. Evolution has yet to deal with the Facts at hand which contradict it, while the Bible simply STATES the facts as is and science proves them true as they find out about them.

Scientific Facts in the Bible from the Evidence Bible

Scientific Facts in the Bible: 100 Reasons to Believe the Bible is Supernatural in Origin (Hidden Wealth Series)

The Case for Christ Study Bible: Investigating the Evidence for Belief

God's word, final, infallible and forever: Compelling evidence for the Bible's inspiration and preservation

The Bible, Rocks and Time: Geological Evidence for the Age of the Earth

Can You Trust the Bible? (Examine the Evidence®)

Compelling Evidence for God and the Bible: Finding Truth in an Age of Doubt

Are There Contradictions in the Bible? (Muncaster, Ralph O. Examine the Evidence Series.)

New Bible evidence from the 1925-1933 excavations

Is the Bible True . . . Really?: A Dialogue on Skepticism, Evidence, and Truth (The Coffee House Chronicles)

Big Book of Bible Difficulties, The: Clear and Concise Answers from Genesis to Revelation

The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Bible (The Politically Incorrect Guides)

Age of the earth in the light of special revelation

1. Only in recent years has science discovered that everything we see is composed of invisible atoms. Here, Scripture tells us that the "things which are seen were not made of things which do appear."

2. Medical science has only recently discovered that blood-clotting in a newborn reaches its peak on the eighth day, then drops. The Bible consistently says that a baby must be circumcised on the eighth day.

3. At a time when it was believed that the earth sat on a large animal or a giant (1500 B.C.), the Bible spoke of the earth’s free float in space: "He...hangs the earth upon nothing" (Job 26:7).

4. The prophet Isaiah also tells us that the earth is round: "It is he that sits upon the circle of the earth" (Isaiah 40:22). This is not a reference to a flat disk, as some skeptics maintain, but to a sphere. Secular man discovered this 2,400 years later. At a time when science and FALSE believed that the earth was flat, is was the Scriptures that inspired Christopher Columbus to sail around the world (see Proverbs 3:6 footnote).

5. God told Job in 1500 B.C.: "Can you send lightnings, that they may go, and say to you, Here we are?" (Job 38:35). The Bible here is making what appears to be a scientifically ludicrous statement—that light can be sent, and then manifest itself in speech. But did you know that radio waves travel at the speed of light?

This is why you can have instantaneous wireless communication with someone on the other side of the earth. Science didn’t discover this until 1864 when "British scientist James Clerk Maxwell suggested that electricity and light waves were two forms of the same thing" (Modern Century Illustrated Encyclopedia).

6. Job 38:19 asks, "Where is the way where light dwells?" Modern man has only recently discovered that light (electromagnetic radiation) has a "way," traveling at 186,000 miles per second.

7. Science has discovered that stars emit radio waves, which are received on earth as a high pitch. God mentioned this in Job 38:7: "When the morning stars sang together..."

8. "Most cosmologists (scientists who study the structures and evolution of the universe) agree that the Genesis account of creation, in imagining an initial void, may be uncannily close to the truth" (Time, Dec. 1976).

9. Solomon described a "cycle" of air currents two thousand years before scientists "discovered" them. "The wind goes toward the south, and turns about unto the north; it whirls about continually, and the wind returns again according to his circuits" (Ecclesiastes 1:6).

10. Science expresses the universe in five terms: time, space, matter, power, and motion. Genesis 1:1,2 revealed such truths to the Hebrews in 1450 B.C.: "In the beginning [time] God created [power] the heaven [space] and the earth [matter] . . . And the Spirit of God moved [motion] upon the face of the waters." The first thing God tells man is that He controls of all aspects of the universe.

11. The great biological truth concerning the importance of blood in our body’s mechanism has been fully comprehended only in recent years. Up until 120 years ago, sick people were "bled," and many died because of the practice. If you lose your blood, you lose your life. Yet Leviticus 17:11, written 3,000 years ago, declared that blood is the source of life: "For the life of the flesh is in the blood."

12. All things were made by Him (see John 1:3), including dinosaurs. Why then did the dinosaur disappear? The answer may be in Job 40:15–24. In this passage, God speaks about a great creature called "behemoth." Some commentators think this was a hippopotamus. However, the hippo’s tail isn’t like a large tree, but a small twig. Following are the characteristics of this huge animal: It was the largest of all the creatures God made; was plant-eating (herbivorous); had its strength in its hips and a tail like a large tree.

It had very strong bones, lived among the trees, drank massive amounts of water, and was not disturbed by a raging river. He appears impervious to attack because his nose could pierce through snares, but Scripture says, "He that made him can make his sword to approach unto him." In other words, God caused this, the largest of all the creatures He had made, to become extinct.

13. Encyclopedia Britannica documents that in 1845, a young doctor in Vienna named Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis was horrified at the terrible death rate of women who gave birth in hospitals. As many as 30 percent died after giving birth. Semmelweis noted that doctors would examine the bodies of patients who died, then, without washing their hands, go straight to the next ward and examine expectant mothers.

This was their normal practice, because the presence of microscopic diseases was unknown. Semmelweis insisted that doctors wash their hands before examinations, and the death rate immediately dropped to 2 percent.

Look at the specific instructions God gave His people for when they encounter disease: "And when he that has an issue is cleansed of his issue; then he shall number to himself even days for his cleansing, and wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in running water, and shall be clean" (Leviticus 15:13).

Until recent years, doctors washed their hands in a bowl of water, leaving invisible germs on their hands. However, the Bible says specifically to wash hands under "running water."

14. Luke 17:34–36 says the Second Coming of Jesus Christ will occur while some are asleep at night and others are working at daytime activities in the field. This is a clear indication of a revolving earth, with day and night at the same time.

15. "During the devastating Black Death of the fourteenth century, patients who were sick or dead were kept in the same rooms as the rest of the family. People often wondered why the disease was affecting so many people at one time. They attributed these epidemics to ‘bad air’ or ‘evil spirits.’ However, careful attention to the medical commands of God as revealed in Leviticus would have saved untold millions of lives.

Arturo Castiglione wrote about the overwhelming importance of this biblical medical law: ‘The laws against leprosyin Leviticus 13 may be regarded as the first model of sanitary legislation’ (A History of Medicine)."

Grant R. Jeffery, The Signature of God

"With all these truths revealed in Scripture, how could a thinking person deny that the Bible is supernatural in origin?"

There is no other book in any of the world’s religions (Vedas, Bhagavad-Gita, Koran, Book of Mormon, etc.) that contains scientific truth. In fact, they contain statements that are clearly unscientific.

Hank Hanegraaff said,

"Faith in Christ is not some blind leap into a dark chasm, but a faith based on established evidence." (Hebrews 11:1 )

The Bible is ANYTHING but circular reasoning, it is a witness to great things proven within its supernatural pages.

The Bible: Proofs of its Supernatural Origin!

http://www.gospeloutreach.net/bibsuper.html

To deny this is to close one's mind to facts that bother your theory of beginnings.

No comments:

The Bible States:

"The God who made the world and all things in it, since He is Lord of heaven and earth, does not dwell in temples made with hands; neither is He served by human hands, as though He needed anything, since He Himself gives to all life and breath and all things; and He made from one, every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined their appointed times, and the boundaries of their habitation, that they should seek God, if perhaps they might grope for Him and find Him, though He is not far from each one of us; for in Him we live and move and exist, as even some of your own poets have said, 'For we also are His offspring.'

"Being then the offspring of God, we ought not to think that the Divine Nature is like gold or silver or stone, an image formed by the art and thought of man.

"Therefore having overlooked the times of ignorance, God is now declaring to men that all everywhere should repent, because He has fixed a day in which He will judge the world in righteousness through a Man whom He has appointed, having furnished proof to all men by raising Him from the dead." (Acts 17:24-31)

Laws of science prove the existence of God! FIND OUT MORE HERE!

Proof #1 expanded:

Laws of science as to how the physical universe operates combined with direct observations as to how nature operates prove that the physical universe had to have a beginning that was caused by a creator/designer who is a non-physical, powerful, intelligent, eternal being.

_________

In this chapter I’m going to present an overall proof of the existence of God from the perspectives of science, logic and direct observations of how nature operates.

Later chapters will be devoted to the many supporting proofs that come from specific sciences, such as geology, astronomy, microbiology, psychology, sociology and logic.

First, let me explain why many vocal proponents of modern science don’t make it to “God” as an explanation of the origins of the universe and why this is an error.

An error that proponents of the most visible modern science theories about the origin of the universe make is they try to explain everything through physical science. (It’s good to remember that they are called “theories”—though they are often presented as facts.)

They accept a Big Bang Theory - which says that the physical universe emerged out of a tiny, very dense piece of matter - and then try to come up with, or hold out for, a physical reason as to where the material and impetus for the Big Bang came from.

The current prevailing theory is that it all came out of a black hole, which is said to be a “tiny, very dense piece of matter” whose gravitational pull is so strong that even light can’t escape it.

But even with that theory they are still left with these basic dilemmas as to the origin of the universe:

where did the black hole, which is envisioned as being physical, come from?

What is behind its specific design?

What caused it, and why was it caused?

Why was it caused to “bang”?

Why did it bang into the specific designs of the physical universe (e.g. galaxies, complex atoms, etc.)?

The way these dilemmas are often dealt with by modern scientists is:

“We can trace the origin of the universe back to a micro-second right after the Big Bang happened. But we don’t know what happened in that micro-second.” The important additional question would be: “What went on before that microsecond?” ... which I’ll give a scientific explanation for in this chapter.

So a problem with modern science is that it limits itself to seeking an answer just through physical science. Obviously an answer isn’t emerging from that mindset.

That is because the answer isn’t within the physical realm. The scientific inquiry must expand to “all possibilities” in order to reveal the answer as to where the physical universe came from.

In a search for that answer, I will now show why we should abandon any kind of physical explanation to the origin of the physical universe.

Any physical explanation has a major problem because it clashes with some proven laws of physics. It is those laws of physics that will give us our first big clue that will lead to showing that God exists.

So let’s start with those laws of physics.

The First Law of Thermodynamics - also known as the Law of Conservation of Mass and Energy - says that, “Energy can neither be created nor destroyed.”

That is, within a “closed system,” no new energy can be added. And the universe as a whole can be considered to be a closed system because energy has never been observed to enter it or leave it, only to be transformed within it.

Now, we live in a universe that has constant physical motion going on in it … from the largest stars (explosions and drift) down to how the atomic level is perceived (constant whirring of electrons at extremely high speeds).

And just like it takes gas to run a car and food to run our bodies and electricity to run much of what’s in our homes (as a black out will quickly tell you), it takes energy to keep up all the visible (and even some of the invisible) motion in the universe.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics tells us that once the energy has been used, it - like gasoline with cars - is no longer available to be used as energy.

Logic then tells us that if there is only a finite supply of energy in a closed system, and there is no cosmic equivalent of a gas station, at some point it will all be used up.

What important thing does that tell us? It tells us that the physical universe can’t have a past that stretches back to infinity.

Because no matter how slow the rate of energy use, over the stretch of infinity, a finite amount of energy would have been used up by now because no new energy is being added in. Therefore the physical universe had to have a beginning.

On this point, theology and most modern scientists agree - e.g., one expression of that would be the Big Bang theory; another would be that God created the universe.

Where they part is in describing the nature of that beginning, where it came from, and what came before it.

The resolution to that is simple. If the physical universe couldn’t have been created by something physical (as the First Law of Thermodynamics states), then the conclusion is obvious: the physical universe had to be started by something non-physical.

Therefore, any scientific inquiry into the origin of the universe must only look for a non-physical answer and abandon all attempts to determine the origin using physical explanations.

Even if they come up with a new physical explanation, they will still be left with the dilemma: what caused that physical cause (since all physicality has to have been caused … as is stated by the First Law of Thermodynamics, which says that physicality can’t cause itself.)

You might be asking yourself at this point, “Well if there is a non-physical causer, who or what caused the causer?”

I’ll deal with that question in detail in the Logic chapter, but a simple answer for now is: spiritual nature and physical nature (physics) are two different kinds of realities with a different set of properties and laws governing them.

To summarize, laws of physics tell us that the universe had to have a beginning because if the universe was always here, all the energy would have been used up by now.

By the way, as a side note, I did an interview on a radio talk show that focuses primarily on aliens and UFO’s.

My main point on that show was that even if there were aliens, there still has to be a God, because aliens are envisioned as physical creatures, and as I just pointed out, physicality can’t create itself.

Therefore even aliens, if they exist, had to have had a non-physical creator.

I don’t know why this concept that the physical universe had to have a non-physical beginner is so hard to accept by many scientists.

Perhaps it’s because, as NASA astronomer Robert Jastrow said, “Theologians generally are delighted with the proof that the universe had a beginning, but astronomers are curiously upset.

It turns out that the scientist behaves the way the rest of us do when our beliefs are in conflict with the evidence.”

He also said this about the modern scientist who has refused to acknowledge God and the Bible in the quest for truth.

“He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have been sitting there for centuries.”

And the non-physical causer that I’ve scientifically proven here is what's over that “final rock”.

A conclusion here could be:

Some modern scientists who are atheists could have an other-than-scientific agenda for their stand and is using his or her status as a scientist to try to lend credibility to that agenda.

But as I’ve shown here, that stand is not well founded, either scientifically or logically.

© 2009 Dennis Marcellino

WANT MORE? CLICK HERE!

With this book you get many books-worth of the best proofs that
God exists and the Bible is true
- including new proofs -
all in just one book.

My Blogs of Note: Visit, Study, Be Blessed Today! Get Involved!

TRUTH: Will You Let it Set You Free!?

http://ministerofblog.wordpress.com/

Got Questions? Well...here are Answers to sharpen your mind and build your faith in the Anointed Jesus!

Skeptical of Skepticism: The Doorway of Belief!

http://skepticalofskepticism.blogspot.com/

Can a Skeptic ever really know the proof they seek?

Can the vast evidence available ever be viewed by skeptics as proof positive of God and Creation?

I can prove that what skeptics call an "open mind" is in reality a CLOSED HEART to any evidence that doesn't support a preconceived viewpoint, and thus will not be viewed as "proof" of God's existence!

Light from the Darkness: Hope from despair!

http://hopefromdispair.blogspot.com/

The Light of the true and Living God can and is willing to eradicate your sin no matter what you've done.

Witchcraft's, Occultism, Sexual Abuse, Darkness of ANY kind is no match for Jesus Christ!

"Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them." Ephesians 5:11

The Popular Vote Matters

http://popularvotecounts.blogspot.com/

We must raise red flags on red ink because more of the same irresponsible spending of ANY President from Either side of the political spectrum will not create jobs or achieve long-term economic recover

Mortgaging our children and their future despite our Constitution will only drive us deeper into the ditch of Progressive Socialism.

Truth in Prophecy: The Historical Facts Revealed!

http://truthinprophecy.blogspot.com/

The Church has LOST her message, the message of hope and turn around.

The Book of the Revelation of Jesus Christ GIVEN to the Church was never meant as an escapist book but a fair warning to prepare in the last days of History.

It is an Historical book from the early Church forward, its that simple, its not a book of ALL FUTURE EVENTS and a Church-less future.

The Ministerofblog: Will you let TRUTH set you Free?!

http://ministerofblog.blogspot.com/

There is evidence for God available for your eyes to see and your ears to hear...you need only OPEN YOUR MIND & HEART to receive it!

I present to you here...Evidence for your investigation, real investigation to prove for yourself God is real!

THIS IS THE ONE STOP ANSWER FOR THE CHRISTIAN FAITH....TAKE THE CHALLENGE TODAY!

It Stands Unrefuted by Scientists ANYWHERE!

The following reports are in one of three formats. To view the ones in PDF format, use Adobe Acrobat Reader. To view the ones in RTF format, you may use MS Word.

Reports Dealing with Radiohalos

Gentry, R.V. 1968. "Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Certain Variant Radioactive Halos." Science 160, 1228. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1970. "Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of Unknown Alpha-Radioactivity?" Science 169, 670. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1974. "Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Science 184, 62. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
Gentry, R.V. 1977. "Mystery of the Radiohalos." Research Communications NETWORK, Breakthrough Report, February 10, 1977. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978b. "Implications on Unknown Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks." Nature 274, 457. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1978c. "Reinvestigation of the α Activity of Conway Granite." Nature 273, 217. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1979. "Time: Measured Responses." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 60, 474. PDF RTF
Gentry, R.V. 1980. "Polonium Halos." EOS Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 61, 514. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
Gentry, R.V. 1984a. "Radioactive Halos in a Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective." Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science 1, 38. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89. HTML
Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints of Creation." Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal 12, 287. HTML
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1973. "Ion Microprobe Confirmation of Pb Isotope Ratios and Search for Isomer Precursors in Polonium Radiohalos." Nature 244, 282. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1974. "'Spectacle' Array of Po-210 Halo Radiocentres in Biotite: A Nuclear Geophysical Enigma." Nature 252, 564. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1976a. "Radiohalos and Coalified Wood: New Evidence Relating to the Time of Uranium Introduction and Coalification." Science 194, 315. HTML PDF

Reports Dealing with Helium and Lead Retention in Zircons

Gentry, R.V. 1984b. "Lead Retention in Zircons" (Technical Comment). Science 223, 835.
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1982a. "Differential Lead Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste Containment." Science 216, 296. HTML PDF
Gentry, R.V. et al. 1982b. "Differential Helium Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste Containment." Geophysical Research Letters 9, 1129. HTML PDF

Reports Dealing with Astronomy and Cosmology

Gentry, R. V. 1997. "A New Redshift Interpretation." Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 12, No. 37, 2919. (This paper was also posted in 1998 on the Los Alamos National Laboratory E-Print arXive: astro-ph/9806280.) HTML PDF
Gentry, R. V. 1998. "The Genuine Cosmic Rosetta." This paper was posted on what was then the Los Alamos National Laboratory E-Print arXive: gr-gc/9806061. HTML PDF
Gentry, R. V. 1998. "The New Redshift Interpretation Affirmed." This paper was posted on what was then the Los Alamos National Laboratory E-Print arXive: physics/9810051. HTML PDF
Gentry, R. V. 2003. "Discovery of a Major Contradiction in Big Bang Cosmology Points to the New Cosmic Center Universe Model." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-021. HTML PDF
Gentry, R. V. 2003. "New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's Major Predictions Without the F-L Paradigm." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-022. PDF
Gentry, R. V. 2004. "Collapse of Big Bang Cosmology and the Emergence of the New Cosmic Center Model of the Universe." Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 56, 4. HTML PDF

The first three astronomy and cosmology papers may also be obtained by going to the the web sites of either Los Alamos National Laboratory or arXiv.org. arXiv.org is currently adminstered by Cornell University.

NOTE: For more information about the Big Bang's fatal flaws and "The Great 21st Century Scientific Watergate," please check out our sister site, www.orionfdn.org.

1987 Challenge to the National Academy of Sciences

Our open letter of March 24, 1987, to Dr. Frank Press, president of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Press claimed that "evidence for creationism" has been scientifically invalidated, though he well knew this has not been the case for the polonium-halo evidence. Our letter once again requests him and other evolutionists to publicly explain how the polonium-halo evidence for creation has indeed been invalidated, this time on April 13 at the University of Tennessee. We suggest that Dr. Stephen Gould be the first one to speak on behalf of the academy, given his strong language denouncing the term, "creation science." HTML GIF
Our Knoxville Sentinel ad on April 12, 1987, announcing our presentation on the evening of the 13th at the University of Tennessee. Included in the ad was a copy of the above open letter to Dr. Press. HTML GIF
A press release from the Society for Creation Science, announcing the reading of Dr. Press's written reply that evening, April 13, 1987, at the University of Tennessee. HTML GIF

Year 2000 Challenge to the National Academy of Sciences

Our letter of March 22, 2000, to Dr. Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Alberts claimed that evidence for special creation has been experimentally falsified.
This letter requests the Academy to publicly explain at Wichita State University on March 30, 2000, why it has chosen to reject the published evidence for the Genesis creation, evidence which after more than twenty-five years still stands unrefuted in the open scientific literature. HTML

Did you know that scientific evidence abounds to support the biblical accounts of creation and the flood?

Were you aware that reports outlining this evidence passed peer review, and were published in the open scientific literature?

Have you heard that, decades later, this evidence still stands unrefuted by the scientific community?

Skeptical of Skepticism: The Doorway of Belief!

Was Jesus invented through ancient myths?

Monday, January 24, 2011

The Bible: Circular Reasoning or Proof of God?

Evolution is Missing a Mathematical Formula!

No comments:

Post a Comment