Pages of Merit: To Expand your Thinking!
- The Straw-man Argument and Logic!
- Human Judgment CONCERNING GOD! Are you Worthy to J...
- Atheism: This Is How They Think About You And The ...
- The Bible: The Proof, The Truth and The Misconceptions Answered!
- Let's get Logical: Understanding those who DO NOT ...
- Talking to an Atheist: Reasoning with Unreasonable Hate!
If you want to know where I'm coming from, Read My Blogs From The Beginning!
- ► January (10)
- ► February (20)
- ► 2013 (8)
- ▼ 2014 (3)
PROOF OF THE REAL MOUNT SINAI IN ARABIA!
Because scientists being naturally skeptical, have minds trapped in the box of the five physical senses they cannot focus therefore on the supernatural aspects to understand the biblical 'Birdseye view' of God, who sees things from OUTSIDE time and space, the box that we as finite are limited within .
There was a reason why Jesus said you must be born again. It is a SPIRITUAL rebirth [Both of Mind and Spirit] that is needed to release the hidden evidence of things we cannot witness from inside this physical 'BOX' universe.
I KNOW from personal experience that the Bible is true but I cannot convince you, you must find the truth yourself. THAT'S HOW LIFE WORKS!
Spend less time developing your skeptical natural mind and THAT'S WHAT YOUR DOING, and more time focusing on what Christ taught and you will discover as I have, the truth. You can only interpret the Universe through the shaded lens of your own understanding!
Saturday, September 20, 2014
Friday, September 19, 2014
Truth: Horus was NOT conceived of a virgin. In fact, mural and textual evidence from Egypt indicates Isis (there is no evidence that “Meri” was ever part of her name) hovered over the erect penis (she created) of Osiris to conceive Horus.
Truth: There is no reference to a cave or manger in the Egyptian birth story of Horus. In fact, none of these details are present in the ancient Egyptian stories of Horus. Horus was born in a swamp. His birth was not heralded by an angel. There was no star.
Truth: There is no continuous effort in the Horus mythology to account for all these years, so there are no real gaps in the chronology. Horus never taught in any temple at twelve (as did Jesus).
Truth: Horus was never baptized. While conspiracy theorists often point to “Anup the Baptizer” (claiming he was later beheaded), there is no such person in Horus’ story.
Truth: Horus had only four disciples (called ‘Heru-Shemsu’), but at some point in his story there is reference to sixteen followers and a group of unnumbered followers who join Horus in battle (called ‘mesnui’).
Truth: Horus certainly performed miracles (he was, after all, described as a god). But there was no mention of exorcizing demons, raising people from the dead or walking on water.
Truth: No one in Egyptian history was ever called “Iusa” (the word does not exist) nor was anyone called “Holy Child”.
Truth: Horus never delivered a “Sermon on the Mount”, nor was he transfigured.
Truth: Horus is not reported to have died at all in the vast majority of Egyptian narratives. There is also no crucifixion story. Instead, Horus is usually described as eventually merging with Re (the Sun god) after which he “dies” and is “reborn” every day as the sun rises. There is a parallel account describing Horus’ death and detailing how he was cast in pieces into the water, later fished out by a crocodile at Isis’ request.
Truth: None of these titles are in Egyptian history, but Horus is called by several names you might expect for any god in mythology: “Great God”, “Chief of the Powers”, “Master of Heaven”, and “Avenger of His Father”. Horus was not called “the Krst”. This word in Egyptian means “burial” (it wasn’t a title at all).
Truth: Some of conspiracy theorists associate Horus with fish (by virtue of the fact that Horus was a fish in some portion of the ancient narrative), but there is no evidence Horus was ever called a “fisher” or was ever associated with the Lion or the Lamb.
Truth: There was no Egyptian “law” for Horus to fulfill, and there is no mention of a thousand year reign in Egyptian mythology.
J. Warner Wallace is a Cold-Case Detective, a Christian Case Maker, and the author of Cold-Case Christianity and ALIVE
Subscribe to J. Warner’s Daily Email
Sunday, April 13, 2014
WHAT ARE THE LAWS OF LOGIC?
Everything that exists has a specific nature. Each entity exists as something in particular and it has characteristics that are a part of what it is.
There are arguably three versions of the principle of non-contradiction to be found in Aristotle: an ontological, a doxastic and a semantic version. The first version is about things that exist in the world, the second is about what we can believe, and the third relates to assertion and truth.
According to this law, every quality either belongs, or does not belong, to a given nature. There is no logical compromise, or exception, and no middle alternative. It is this law which accounts for Aristotelian logic's hierarchical nature. For if there is a single nature for every class, that which has more of that essential quality will be judged superior to that which possesses less. Based on the law of excluded middle, the concept of the hierarchy of values is established.
This law states that not only is X, X, and that X is not non-X, it adds that X is X and nothing in between.
A deductive inference is one that is intended to be valid, where a valid inference is one in which the conclusion must be true if the premises are true.
All other inferences are called inductive.
Those who claim to believe in logic have to understand that they are using the very proof that God exists to argue he doesn't. Circular reasoning and begging the question are the usual fair whenever you borrow from one beliefs proof's to even have a reason for your own argument to exist because reason and logic are not existent in a naturalistic worldview.
The natural world through macro-evolutionary processes does not use nor need logic so where did it originate? It is evident that micro-evolution or rather the true variation within God's "kinds" from which all species developed is the only splinter of truth with which logic works. But even with this simple example of fact the skeptic must fight logic extending this beyond any reasonable scientific basis to macro-evolution which has NO basis in science!
How could a 'distinct system' of immaterial understanding and logic develop THROUGH a process so limited to natural solutions for life?
Where in the world did our "brains" develop immaterial (soul) powers like thinking, reasoning and problem solving if we came up from lesser life forms that manifest none of these?
Seems like the Atheist's Catch 22 to me, damned if they use it and damned if they don't!
The problem with skeptics is NOT their natural skepticism which is good to have but the inconsistent and dishonest way in which they ap...
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “GOD-IS-NO-WHERE & GOD-IS-NOW-HERE” is only a matter of PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE! Just because WE don't see...
What about these BIG events in the Bible? Is there Evidence concerning these events from Science, Archeology, or History? http://www.b...
Part 3 - The Bibles Big Events - The feeding of thousands of people by Jesus using only five loaves of bread and two fishes!The feeding of five thousand + by Jesus using only five loaves of bread and two fishes! (Mark 6:34-44; see also the parallel accounts in...
“Evolution” mixes two things together, one real, one imaginary. Variation is the real part. The types of bird beaks, the colors of moths,...
Part 2 - The Bibles BIG Events - The stopping of the sun in Joshua and The reversal of the sun's course in Isaiah!The parting of the sea by Moses (Exodus 14:21-31) EVIDENCE PRESENTED LAST BLOG! The following Answer may not be to the liking of most skep...
“The God of the Old Testament has got to be the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous, and proud of it, pet...
This is the beginning of a response to the above 'Atheistic Essay' in Full context, click the Tab to read it in full before startin...
The Following is a debate between me and an Atheist on Sodahead .com where I daily debate Atheists and Liberal Progressives. I w...
When people ask for evidence of God or of Creation they fail to take the most important step to receive it in the first place, as I'v...
- Before you look at the links below know this about me, I do not know everything about anything, I know only what God has revealed to me.
Proving God exists CANNOT be done for the person who is not open to hearing and seeing the evidence as God sees it. Faith is the KEY to releasing all the evidence contained in creation, in man's heart and his mind. Without FAITH no one can ever please God so to throw away faith as unimportant destroys our receptivity to the evidence!
I was a hypocrite, a sinner and a fool, sometimes even as a believer but as long as God is in control I'm forgiven and healed of every form of human shortcoming. Nothing can stand before the evidence contained in Faith.....NOTHING!
LEARN MORE ABOUT ME AND MY MINISTRY HERE!
It Stands Unrefuted by Scientists ANYWHERE!
The following reports are in one of three formats. To view the ones in PDF format, use Adobe Acrobat Reader. To view the ones in RTF format, you may use MS Word.
Reports Dealing with Radiohalos
- Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
- Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
- Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
- Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
- Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
- Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
- Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
- Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
- Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
- Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89. HTML
- Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints of Creation." Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal 12, 287. HTML
- Gentry, R.V. et al. 1976a. "Radiohalos and Coalified Wood: New Evidence Relating to the Time of Uranium Introduction and Coalification." Science 194, 315. HTML PDF
Reports Dealing with Helium and Lead Retention in Zircons
- Gentry, R.V. 1984b. "Lead Retention in Zircons" (Technical Comment). Science 223, 835.
- Gentry, R.V. et al. 1982b. "Differential Helium Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste Containment." Geophysical Research Letters 9, 1129. HTML PDF
Reports Dealing with Astronomy and Cosmology
- Gentry, R. V. 1998. "The New Redshift Interpretation Affirmed." This paper was posted on what was then the Los Alamos National Laboratory E-Print arXive: physics/9810051. HTML PDF
- Gentry, R. V. 2003. "Discovery of a Major Contradiction in Big Bang Cosmology Points to the New Cosmic Center Universe Model." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-021. HTML PDF
- Gentry, R. V. 2003. "New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's Major Predictions Without the F-L Paradigm." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-022. PDF
- Gentry, R. V. 2004. "Collapse of Big Bang Cosmology and the Emergence of the New Cosmic Center Model of the Universe." Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 56, 4. HTML PDF
The first three astronomy and cosmology papers may also be obtained by going to the the web sites of either Los Alamos National Laboratory or arXiv.org. arXiv.org is currently adminstered by Cornell University.
NOTE: For more information about the Big Bang's fatal flaws and "The Great 21st Century Scientific Watergate," please check out our sister site, www.orionfdn.org.
1987 Challenge to the National Academy of Sciences
Our open letter of March 24, 1987, to Dr. Frank Press, president of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Press claimed that "evidence for creationism" has been scientifically invalidated, though he well knew this has not been the case for the polonium-halo evidence. Our letter once again requests him and other evolutionists to publicly explain how the polonium-halo evidence for creation has indeed been invalidated, this time on April 13 at the University of Tennessee. We suggest that Dr. Stephen Gould be the first one to speak on behalf of the academy, given his strong language denouncing the term, "creation science." HTML GIF
Our Knoxville Sentinel ad on April 12, 1987, announcing our presentation on the evening of the 13th at the University of Tennessee. Included in the ad was a copy of the above open letter to Dr. Press. HTML GIF
Our letter of March 22, 2000, to Dr. Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Alberts claimed that evidence for special creation has been experimentally falsified.
This letter requests the Academy to publicly explain at Wichita State University on March 30, 2000, why it has chosen to reject the published evidence for the Genesis creation, evidence which after more than twenty-five years still stands unrefuted in the open scientific literature. HTML
Were you aware that reports outlining this evidence passed peer review, and were published in the open scientific literature?
Have you heard that, decades later, this evidence still stands unrefuted by the scientific community?