Pages of Merit: To Expand your Thinking!
- The Straw-man Argument and Logic!
- Human Judgment CONCERNING GOD! Are you Worthy to J...
- Atheism: This Is How They Think About You And The ...
- The Bible: The Proof, The Truth and The Misconceptions Answered!
- Let's get Logical: Understanding those who DO NOT ...
- Talking to an Atheist: Reasoning with Unreasonable Hate!
If you want to know where I'm coming from, Read My Blogs From The Beginning!
- ▼ January (10)
- ► February (20)
- ► 2013 (8)
PROOF OF THE REAL MOUNT SINAI IN ARABIA!
Because scientists being naturally skeptical, have minds trapped in the box of the five physical senses they cannot focus therefore on the supernatural aspects to understand the biblical 'Birdseye view' of God, who sees things from OUTSIDE time and space, the box that we as finite are limited within .
There was a reason why Jesus said you must be born again. It is a SPIRITUAL rebirth [Both of Mind and Spirit] that is needed to release the hidden evidence of things we cannot witness from inside this physical 'BOX' universe.
I KNOW from personal experience that the Bible is true but I cannot convince you, you must find the truth yourself. THAT'S HOW LIFE WORKS!
Spend less time developing your skeptical natural mind and THAT'S WHAT YOUR DOING, and more time focusing on what Christ taught and you will discover as I have, the truth. You can only interpret the Universe through the shaded lens of your own understanding!
Sunday, January 30, 2011
Part 1 - The Doorway of Proving what we hope for :The Faith of God!
The problem with skeptics is NOT their natural skepticism which is good to have but the inconsistent and dishonest way in which they ap...
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN “GOD-IS-NO-WHERE & GOD-IS-NOW-HERE” is only a matter of PERSONAL PERSPECTIVE! Just because WE don't see...
What about these BIG events in the Bible? Is there Evidence concerning these events from Science, Archeology, or History? http://www.b...
Part 3 - The Bibles Big Events - The feeding of thousands of people by Jesus using only five loaves of bread and two fishes!The feeding of five thousand + by Jesus using only five loaves of bread and two fishes! (Mark 6:34-44; see also the parallel accounts in...
“Evolution” mixes two things together, one real, one imaginary. Variation is the real part. The types of bird beaks, the colors of moths,...
Part 2 - The Bibles BIG Events - The stopping of the sun in Joshua and The reversal of the sun's course in Isaiah!The parting of the sea by Moses (Exodus 14:21-31) EVIDENCE PRESENTED LAST BLOG! The following Answer may not be to the liking of most skep...
“The God of the Old Testament has got to be the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous, and proud of it, pet...
This is the beginning of a response to the above 'Atheistic Essay' in Full context, click the Tab to read it in full before startin...
The Following is a debate between me and an Atheist on Sodahead .com where I daily debate Atheists and Liberal Progressives. I w...
When people ask for evidence of God or of Creation they fail to take the most important step to receive it in the first place, as I'v...
- Before you look at the links below know this about me, I do not know everything about anything, I know only what God has revealed to me.
Proving God exists CANNOT be done for the person who is not open to hearing and seeing the evidence as God sees it. Faith is the KEY to releasing all the evidence contained in creation, in man's heart and his mind. Without FAITH no one can ever please God so to throw away faith as unimportant destroys our receptivity to the evidence!
I was a hypocrite, a sinner and a fool, sometimes even as a believer but as long as God is in control I'm forgiven and healed of every form of human shortcoming. Nothing can stand before the evidence contained in Faith.....NOTHING!
LEARN MORE ABOUT ME AND MY MINISTRY HERE!
It Stands Unrefuted by Scientists ANYWHERE!
The following reports are in one of three formats. To view the ones in PDF format, use Adobe Acrobat Reader. To view the ones in RTF format, you may use MS Word.
Reports Dealing with Radiohalos
- Gentry, R.V. 1971. "Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and Unknown Alpha Radioactivity." Science 173, 727. PDF
- Gentry, R.V. 1973. "Radioactive Halos." Annual Review of Nuclear Science 23, 347. PDF
- Gentry, R.V. 1975. Response to J.H. Fremlin's Comments on "Spectacle Halos." Nature 258, 269.
- Gentry, R.V. 1978a. "Are Any Unusual Radiohalos Evidence for SHE?" International Symposium on Superheavy Elements, Lubbock, Texas. New York: Pergamon Press. PDF
- Gentry, R.V. 1982. Letters. Physics Today 35, No. 10, 13.
- Gentry, R.V. 1983a. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 4, 3.
- Gentry, R.V. 1983b. Letters. Physics Today 36, No. 11, 124.
- Gentry, R.V. 1984c. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 4, 108.
- Gentry, R.V. 1984d. Letters. Physics Today 37, No. 12, 92.
- Gentry, R.V. 1987a. "Radioactive Halos: Implications for Creation." Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, Vol. II, 89. HTML
- Gentry, R.V. 1998. "Fingerprints of Creation." Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal 12, 287. HTML
- Gentry, R.V. et al. 1976a. "Radiohalos and Coalified Wood: New Evidence Relating to the Time of Uranium Introduction and Coalification." Science 194, 315. HTML PDF
Reports Dealing with Helium and Lead Retention in Zircons
- Gentry, R.V. 1984b. "Lead Retention in Zircons" (Technical Comment). Science 223, 835.
- Gentry, R.V. et al. 1982b. "Differential Helium Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste Containment." Geophysical Research Letters 9, 1129. HTML PDF
Reports Dealing with Astronomy and Cosmology
- Gentry, R. V. 1998. "The New Redshift Interpretation Affirmed." This paper was posted on what was then the Los Alamos National Laboratory E-Print arXive: physics/9810051. HTML PDF
- Gentry, R. V. 2003. "Discovery of a Major Contradiction in Big Bang Cosmology Points to the New Cosmic Center Universe Model." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-021. HTML PDF
- Gentry, R. V. 2003. "New Cosmic Center Universe Model Matches Eight of Big Bang's Major Predictions Without the F-L Paradigm." CERN Preprint, Ext-2003-022. PDF
- Gentry, R. V. 2004. "Collapse of Big Bang Cosmology and the Emergence of the New Cosmic Center Model of the Universe." Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith 56, 4. HTML PDF
The first three astronomy and cosmology papers may also be obtained by going to the the web sites of either Los Alamos National Laboratory or arXiv.org. arXiv.org is currently adminstered by Cornell University.
NOTE: For more information about the Big Bang's fatal flaws and "The Great 21st Century Scientific Watergate," please check out our sister site, www.orionfdn.org.
1987 Challenge to the National Academy of Sciences
Our open letter of March 24, 1987, to Dr. Frank Press, president of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Press claimed that "evidence for creationism" has been scientifically invalidated, though he well knew this has not been the case for the polonium-halo evidence. Our letter once again requests him and other evolutionists to publicly explain how the polonium-halo evidence for creation has indeed been invalidated, this time on April 13 at the University of Tennessee. We suggest that Dr. Stephen Gould be the first one to speak on behalf of the academy, given his strong language denouncing the term, "creation science." HTML GIF
Our Knoxville Sentinel ad on April 12, 1987, announcing our presentation on the evening of the 13th at the University of Tennessee. Included in the ad was a copy of the above open letter to Dr. Press. HTML GIF
Our letter of March 22, 2000, to Dr. Bruce Alberts, president of the National Academy of Sciences. Dr. Alberts claimed that evidence for special creation has been experimentally falsified.
This letter requests the Academy to publicly explain at Wichita State University on March 30, 2000, why it has chosen to reject the published evidence for the Genesis creation, evidence which after more than twenty-five years still stands unrefuted in the open scientific literature. HTML
Were you aware that reports outlining this evidence passed peer review, and were published in the open scientific literature?
Have you heard that, decades later, this evidence still stands unrefuted by the scientific community?